Hello,
I am performing an EN 1993 stability verification of a welded thin-walled I-section using AQUA and BDK.
The cross-section dimensions are:
-
Total height: 3750 mm*
-
Web: 3665 x 28 mm*
-
Top flange: 1000 x 35 mm*
-
Bottom flange: 1200 x 50 mm*
-
Steel grade: S355*
The material and cross-section are defined as follows:
+PROG AQUA
NORM EN 199X-200X
STEE NO 1 TYPE S CLAS 355 TMAX 80
SECT 1 MNO 1 FSYM NONE BTYP BEAM TITL "PRS"
PLAT '1' YB -500 ZB -3732.5 YE 0 ZE -3732.5 T 35 MNO 1 FIXB FREE FIXE 14
PLAT '2' YB 500 ZB -3732.5 YE 0 ZE -3732.5 T 35 MNO 1 FIXB FREE FIXE 14
PLAT '3' YB 0 ZB -3732.5 YE 0 ZE -25 T 28 MNO 1 FIXB 17.5 FIXE 25
PLAT '4' YB -600 ZB -25 YE 0 ZE -25 T 50 MNO 1 FIXB FREE FIXE 14
PLAT '5' YB 600 ZB -25 YE 0 ZE -25 T 50 MNO 1 FIXB FREE FIXE 14
END
For the stability verification, I use BDK with automatic cross-section classification:
+PROG BDK
ECHO FULL FULL
ECHO CLAS EXTR
CTRL MTHD 1
CTRL TAB YES
CTRL LCST 951
LC NO 15000
CVA CB 0 CY FIX CZ FIX DX FIX DY 0 DZ 0
CVE CB 0 CY FIX CZ FIX DX FIX DY 0 DZ 0
CTRL CURV AUTO SCL AUTO
MEMB REF SLN 1 TYPE LTB
END
BDK always returns the following warning:
+++++ warning no. 198 in program BDKDES
No convergence of cross-section classification, please check the cross-section effective properties!
The cross-section is Class 4. If I force the cross-section classification using SCL 3, the BDK calculation runs. However, I am only using this as a diagnostic test because the original cross-section is Class 4.
-
Is the thin-walled cross-section correctly defined, particularly the FIXB and FIXE values for the outstand flanges and the internal web?
-
Should BDK normally be able to determine the effective properties of this Class 4 section automatically using SCL AUTO?
-
If the automatic classification does not converge, is the recommended solution to define a separate effective cross-section in AQUA using TYPE NEFF and use that section for the BDK verification?
Thank you for your help.
Esteban