I have a problem with the non-functional RSET functionality to use RSETs of a previous definition with a new set for superposition. Within SOFIMSHA this is working:
RSET ID 30 BEZ ‘Axis 10’
RSET ‘LS1’ SET FEDE P NR 1001+010+1
RSET ‘LN1’ SET FEDE P NR 1001+110+1
RSET ‘A1L’ ‘=LS1+LN1’ UNIT ‘kN’
and within A1L I can obtain the summation of LS1 and LN1. However this input
RSET ID 30 BEZ ‘Axis 10’
RSET ‘LS1’ SET FEDE P NR 1001+010+1
RSET ‘LN1’ SET FEDE P NR 1001+110+1
RSET ID 40 BEZ ‘Sums’
RSET ‘A1L’ ‘=LS1+LN1’ UNIT ‘kN’
is not working. A1L shows a value of 0.000, no matter what values I obtain for LS1 and LN1
Hi blackbird,
RSET ID 30 BEZ ‘Axis 10’
RSET ‘LS1’ SET FEDE P NR 1001+010+1
RSET ‘LN1’ SET FEDE P NR 1001+110+1
RSET ‘A1L’ ‘=LS1+LN1’ UNIT ‘kN’
=> here the software is able to know the values of LS1 and LN1, they are just defined directly before.
RSET ID 40 BEZ ‘Sums’
RSET ‘A1L’ ‘=LS1+LN1’ UNIT ‘kN’
=> But here: What shall LS1 and LN1 be? The computer cannot know that you perhaps(!) mean these values from RSET 30.
So you must use the first definition.
Regards,
Jost
Hello Jost,
thank you for your answer, which includes a question relevant to the problem: “What shall LS1 and LN1 be?”. Here, I would like to cite the help of sofistik corresponding to the RSET-commmand (see the german screenshot below). Literally it says, you can use any entries of a previous RSET. And here it gets weired, as obviously you can not…Is it a bug?
Ok, we will check this and message you again.
hey there
any progress on this topic?
I’d really appreciate every hint, even if it was “it’s a bug, don’t use it”
Hi blackbird,
the description in manual must be wrong, we will correct this in a future version.
So please follow the hints of my first message.
Best regards,
Jost